AI-Generated Nonconsensual Images Are Increasing — and the Law Is Catching Up

Reports of AI-generated nonconsensual images have increased sharply over the last several years. As generative artificial intelligence tools have become cheaper, faster, and easier to use, they have also been misused to create realistic images of real people — often sexualized or explicit — without those individuals’ knowledge or consent.

What was once technologically difficult is now accessible to anyone with a laptop and a few minutes. The result is a growing category of digital abuse with real-world consequences: reputational damage, emotional distress, professional harm, and, in some cases, threats to personal safety.

Image is of a tablet displaying an AI generated facial image, representing how manipulated media raises legal issues and when deepfake images illegal under Washington D.C. regulations.

What Are AI-Generated Nonconsensual Images?

AI-generated nonconsensual images are synthetic images created using artificial intelligence that depict a real, identifiable person in a scenario that never occurred and to which the person did not consent.

Most commonly, these images:

  • Use a real person’s face or likeness
  • Are generated through “deepfake” or diffusion-based image models
  • Portray the person in explicit, sexual, or compromising situations
  • Are distributed online, through social media, private messages, or commercial websites

Unlike traditional photo manipulation, modern AI tools can produce images that appear convincingly real, even to trained observers. The harm is not hypothetical: once released, these images can spread rapidly, persist indefinitely, and be nearly impossible to fully remove.

Legal Accountability Is Expanding

For years, victims of AI-generated nonconsensual images were told that the law had not yet caught up with the technology. That is changing.

Lawmakers across the United States are:

  • Creating new civil causes of action specifically targeting AI-generated or “deepfake” imagery
  • Expanding existing privacy, likeness, and unlawful-exposure statutes to cover synthetic media
  • Lowering procedural barriers so victims can pursue claims against creators and distributors
  • Authorizing statutory damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees in appropriate cases

These developments reflect a growing recognition that AI-generated abuse is not a novelty — it is a foreseeable and preventable harm, and those responsible can be held accountable in court.

While the details vary by jurisdiction, the overall direction is clear: individuals harmed by AI-generated nonconsensual images increasingly have enforceable legal rights.

Image is of a judge’s gavel beside balanced scales of justice, concept of legal standards and eligibility for a mass tort claim in Louisville.

If You Believe You Are a Victim

If you believe that an AI-generated image of you has been created or shared without your consent — whether publicly or privately — you may have legal options. Early action can matter, both to limit further dissemination and to preserve claims against those responsible.

Anyone who is, or believes they may be, a victim of AI-generated nonconsensual images is encouraged to contact HSGLaW to discuss the situation and potential next steps.